There are several ways of measuring attitudes toward sports, including the Thurstone, Likert, and Osgood scales. Here is a brief overview of each:
Thurstone scale: The Thurstone scale measures attitudes by asking respondents to rate a series of statements related to the attitude object, in this case, sports. The statements are carefully selected to cover the full range of opinions about the attitude object, from strongly positive to strongly negative. Respondents rate each statement on a scale ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree. The scale is then scored to determine the respondent's overall attitude toward sports.
Likert scale: The Likert scale measures attitudes by asking respondents to indicate their level of agreement or disagreement with a series of statements about the attitude object, such as sports. The statements are usually presented in a five-point scale format, with response options ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree. Respondents are asked to choose the response that best reflects their attitude toward sports.
Osgood scale: The Osgood scale measures attitudes by asking respondents to rate a series of bipolar adjectives or phrases that represent different dimensions of the attitude object, such as sports. For example, the scale may include pairs of adjectives such as "exciting-boring," "funny-serious," and "enjoyable-unenjoyable." Respondents are asked to rate the attitude object on each dimension, indicating whether it is more like one end of the scale or the other.
All three scales are commonly used in social science research to measure attitudes toward various topics, including sports. They are reliable and valid measures of attitudes, with each scale offering unique advantages and disadvantages depending on the research question and the characteristics of the sample being studied.
In summary, Thurstone, Likert, and Osgood scales are effective ways of measuring attitudes towards sports and can provide valuable insights into the factors that influence sports-related behavior.
Attitude to sports and sporting behavior
In addition to the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) and the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), the Transtheoretical Model (TTM) can also help explain the factors affecting attitudes toward sports. Here is a brief overview of each:
Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA): The TRA suggests that attitudes towards sports and subjective norms influence an individual's intention to participate in sports, which in turn influences their actual behavior. For example, if an individual has a positive attitude towards sports and perceives that their social network values sports participation, they are more likely to intend to engage in sports.
Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB):
The TPB extends the TRA by including perceived behavioral control as an additional factor influencing behavior. Perceived behavioral control refers to an individual's perception of their ability to perform the behavior, which can influence their intention and actual behavior. For example, an individual may intend to engage in sports, but if they perceive low behavioral control due to a lack of access to sports facilities or lack of skills, they may not engage in sports.
Transtheoretical Model (TTM):
The TTM suggests that behavior change occurs in stages, and individuals may progress through these stages at different rates. The stages include pre-contemplation (not considering behavior change), contemplation (considering behavior change), preparation (preparing to change behavior), action (actively engaging in behavior change), and maintenance (maintaining the behavior change). In the context of sports, an individual may progress through these stages as they consider and adopt sports participation.
Together, these models suggest that attitudes towards sports, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, and stages of behavior change can all influence sports participation. Personal factors such as motivation, self-efficacy, and self-regulation may also play a role. For example, an individual with high self-efficacy for sports may be more likely to engage in sports, even in the face of environmental barriers.
Overall, understanding the factors that influence attitudes towards sports can help inform interventions aimed at promoting sports participation and increasing physical activity levels. By targeting specific factors such as attitudes, subjective norms, and behavioral control, interventions can be tailored to meet the needs of different individuals at different stages of behavior change.
0 Comments